Green Bonanza Services

Negative and positive Androgyny in addition to their Relationship with Psychological Health insurance and Well-Being

Negative and positive Androgyny in addition to their Relationship with Psychological Health insurance and Well-Being

A unique form of scoring the fresh Stretched Personal Properties Questionnaire (EPAQ) was used to assess the constructs regarding positive and negative androgyny. The new EPAQ is actually administered to 196 adult people; their solutions was basically classified towards the a differentiated androgyny. Significant differences was indeed acquired ranging from negative and positive androgynous someone because the well due to the fact anywhere between positive and negative women and you will positive and negative male some one towards a collection of methods away from mental health and well-becoming. This type of findings keep the legitimacy and you will power out-of identifying androgyny to the positive and negative types of sex part identity.


Antill, J., Cunningham, J. (1979). Self-esteem just like the a purpose of masculinity both in genders. Record of Contacting and Logical Psychology, 47, 783-785.

Antill, J., Cunningham, J., Russell, G., Thompson, N. (1981). A keen Australian Intercourse Character Level. Australian Log regarding Therapy, 33, 169-183.

Baril, Grams., Elbert, Letter., Maher-Potter, S., Reavy, Grams. (1989). Is androgynous professionals really more effective? Classification and Organisation Degree, 14, 234-249.

Bem, S. (1977). On the utility out-of choice tips into evaluating out-of mental androgyny, Diary away from Asking and you can Logical Mindset, 45, 196-203.

Boswell, H. (1997). The fresh new transgender paradigm move for the totally free phrase. During the B. Bullough, V. Bullough, J. Elias (Eds.), Sex merging (pp. 53-57). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.

Cheng, C. (1999). Intercourse role variations in awareness into influence of help supply towards the anxiety. Diary from Identity, 67, 439-467.

Fey, W. (1955). Welcome because of the anyone else and its own relation to invited away from mind and others: An effective revaluation. Record away from Irregular and you can Social Psychology, fifty, 274-276.

Eco-friendly, B., Kendrick, D. (1994). The appeal of intercourse sort of faculties within additional relationships account: Androgynous properties is common anyway. Journal off Identification and Personal Psychology, 20, 244-253.

Heilbrun, A great. (1981a). Gender differences in the functional linkage ranging from androgyny, societal knowledge, and you may competence. Record away from Identification and you may Personal Psychology, 41, 1106-1118.

Helmreich, Roentgen., Stapp, J. (1974). Brief form of this new Tx Societal Conclusion Directory, a goal way of measuring thinking-value. Bulletin of Psychometric Society, 4, 473-475.

Hoffman, Roentgen. (2001). The fresh aspect out-of manliness and you will womanliness: Historical direction and you can implications to have therapy. Record off Guidance and Invention, 79, 472-485.

Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, Roentgen. (1990). The fresh new identification and you will translation of telecommunications effects anywhere between continuous parameters for the numerous regression. Multivariate Behavioral Browse, twenty-five, 467-478.

Jones, W., Chernovetz, M., Hansson, R. (1978). The enigma regarding androgyny: Differential effects for males and women. Diary off Consulting and you will Health-related Mindset, 46, 298-313.

Kelly, J., Worrell, J. (1977). The fresh new preparations to possess sex positions and you will androgyny: A significant remark. Journal out-of Scientific and you will Consulting Therapy, forty five, 1101-1115.

Kirchemeyer, C. (1996). Gender spots and you can decision-making within the demographically diverse teams: An incident for reviving androgyny. Sex Opportunities, 34, 49-663.

Kopper, B., Epperson, D. (1996). The action and expression from fury. Relationships with gender role socialization, despair and psychological state doing work. Journal out-of Asking Therapy, 43, 58-165.

Lenney, Elizabeth. (1991). Gender roles: New measurement from masculinity, femininity, and you may androgyny. Within the J. Robinson, D. Razor, L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Actions from character and public emotional attitudes (pp. 573-660). North park, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.

Lubinski, D., Tellegen, An excellent., Butcher, J. (1981). The partnership ranging from androgyny and you will subjective symptoms out of emotional better-are. Journal regarding Character and you will Personal Therapy, forty, 722-730.

Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., Butcher, J. (1983). Masculinity, femininity and androgyny seen and examined due to the fact collection of axioms. Diary out of Character and you can Personal Psychology, 49, 428-439.

s, C. (1989). Androgyny as well as regards to teenage psychological really-being: A peek at the brand new literature. Gender Roles, 21, 25-341.

May, A good., Spangenberg, J. (1997). Androgyny and you will dealing within the men having an effective managerial orientation. Southern African Record regarding Therapy, 27, 244-249.

Mead, B., Ignico, A beneficial. (1992). Kid’s gender had written attitudes regarding physical activity: Consequences and you may ramifications. Perceptual and you can Engine Experience, 75, 1035-1013.

Nowicki, S., Duke., Meters. (1981). New Nowicki-Strickland Life time Locus out of Handle Balances: Construct validation. During the H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Search on the locus regarding manage build (Vol. 2, pp. 16-43). Nyc: Academic Press.

O’Heron, C., Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and non-stereotypic gender character feature and you may decisions orientations, intercourse name and you may psychological improvement. Log out of Identity and you may Personal Mindset, 58, 134-143.

Pearson, J., Cooks, L. (1995). Intercourse and you may stamina. When you look at the P. M. Kalbfleisch M. J. Cody (Eds.), Sex, electricity, and you can correspondence inside individual matchmaking (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Robinson, J., Razor, D., Wrightsman, L. (1991). Procedures from character and you may social emotional perceptions. North park, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Rose, A beneficial., Montemayor, Roentgen. (1994). The partnership between sex part direction and you will sensed thinking-proficiency within the male and female teens. Sex Positions, 30, 579-595.

Russell, G., Antill, J. (1984). An Australian intercourse-part scale: Even more psychometric data and you will correlations having mind-admiration. Australian Psychologist, 19, 13-18.

Sawrie, S., Watson P., Biderman, Yards. (1991). Hostility, intercourse role steps and Kohut’s psychology of your own care about. Intercourse Spots, 25, 41-161.

Schullo, S., Alperson, B. (1984). Interpersonal phenomenology just like the a function of sexual direction, sex, sentiment, and trait categories within the long lasting dyadic matchmaking. Log out of Character and you can Personal Psychology, 47, 983-1002.

Buy solitary article

Razor, P., Papilia, D., Clark, C., Koski, L., Tidwell, Yards., Nalbare, D. (1996). Androgyny and you may attachment protection: A couple related different types of maximum identification. Character and you will Public Therapy Bulletin, twenty-two, 582-597.

Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Kawaai, C., Shinichi, S. (1997). Androgyny and you will profitable version along side life span certainly one of Japanese grownups. Journal away from Genetic Mindset, 158, 389-401.

Skoe, Age. (1995). Sex character orientation and its relationship to the introduction of identity and you can ethical consider. Scandinavian Journal from Therapy, thirty-six, 235-245.

Spence, J. (1984). Masculinity, womanliness, and gender-associated traits: An abstract investigation and you may critique out-of latest lookup. Advances inside the Fresh Identification Browse, 13, 1-97.

Spence, J. (1999). Three decades out-of intercourse lookup: Your own chronicle. In W. Swann Jr., J. Langlois, L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and you may stereotypes from inside the society: The new intercourse science out-of erican Mental Connection.

Spence, J., Buckner, C. (2000). Instrumental and you may expressive qualities, characteristic stereotypes, and sexist perceptions: Precisely what do it denote? Therapy of females Quarterly, 24, 44-62.

Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Holahan, C. (1979). Bad and good parts of emotional maleness and you may womanliness as well as their relationship to care about-accounts regarding neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal off Identity and you can Social Therapy, 37, 1673-1682.


Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). The non-public Functions Questionnaire: A way of measuring intercourse part stereotypes and manliness-womanliness. JSAS Catalogue off Picked Data from inside the Therapy, 4, 43-forty-two.

Stake, J. (1997). Partnering expressiveness and instrumentality within the real-world options: A different angle to your benefits of androgyny. Intercourse Spots, 37, 541-564.

Taylor, M., Hall, J. (1982). Mental androgyny: An evaluation and you will reformulation of your concepts, methods, and you may conclusions. Mental Bulletin, ninety-five, 347-366.

West, C., Zimmerman, D. (2000). Performing intercourse. Within the M. Kimmel (Ed.), The gendered area reader (pp. 131-149). Nyc: Oxford College Drive.

Whitley, B. (1983). Intercourse part positioning and care about-esteem: A significant meta-analytic review, Diary out-of Personality and Societal Therapy, 44, 765-778.

Woodhill, B., Samuels, C. (when you look at the press). Popular and undesirable androgyny: A treatment into the twenty-basic century. Diary away from Intercourse Knowledge.

Wulff, M., Steitz, J. (1999). A road model of the connection between field indecision, androgyny, self-effectiveness and you may thinking-respect. Perceptual and you can Engine Event, 88, 935-940.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *